<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02589nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250403113016.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250403b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSIT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Genato, Allan Crispino</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Oral and injectable (amoxicillin) antibiotic treatment of neonatal piglet diarrhea with and without electrolytes/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Allan Crispino Genato</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State Institute of Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1999</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xii, 43 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ninety-six (96) piglets born to 12 sows were randomly assigned to four modes of treatment for neonatal diarrhea designated as: oral amoxicillin without electrolytes (A2B1) oral amoxicillin with electrolytes (A1B2) injectable amoxicillin without electrolytes (A2B1) and injectable amoxicillin with electrolytes (A2B2)

	This was a 2 x 2 factorial experiment in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) in three replications conducted with the following objectives: (1) to determine the most effective mode of treatment for neonatal diarrhea, and (2) to recommended the best mode of treatment to small scale swine raisers in terms of cost and case of administration.

	Data were obtained from two phases of the study, namely, pre-experimental and experimental phases. Data obtained during the pre-experimental phase were on initial weight, morbidity rate and weight of piglets at the onset of diarrhea. No significant differences were noted at the first two parameters. Significant variations, however, were observed on weight of piglets at the onset of diarrhea. Heavier piglets belonged to smaller litters with an average size of 8.5, while lighter ones came from larger litters with an average size of 10.67.

	No significant variations were noted on the different data collected during the experimental phase of the study. Duration of treatment, mortality rate, recovery rate, weaning weight of piglets affected with diarrhea, and weaning weight of piglets without diarrhea were statistically similar in all treatment groups of piglets

	Results of the experiment revealed that any of the four modes of treatment for neonatal piglet diarrhea were effective against the disease. However, if cost of treatment was considered, the oral amoxicillin without electrolyte (A&#x2081;,B&#x2081;) was the cheapest. In terms of ease of administration, the intramuscular route of drug administration was easier than the oral route.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Master of Science - Animal Science)
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes appendices and bibliographical references
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">802</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">802</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-04-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T G324o 1999</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T549</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-04-03 11:30:59</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-04-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
