<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02173nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250402161152.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250402b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Saguiped, Lolita Bambico</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Deveopmelnt of ginger-flavored ice cream (sorbetes) enriched with squash (cucurbita maxima L.) and sweet potato (ipomoea batatas)/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Lolita Bambico Saguiped</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xi, 56 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations, photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">	This study was conducted to develop a novel ice cream that is flavored with ginger and enriched with squash and/or sweet potato Specifically this study aims to determine the quality of different formulations of ice cream in terms of color/appearance, texture, body and overrun and find out their corresponding degree of acceptability.

	A panel of 60 evaluators, 30 adults and 30 children evaluated the finished product.

	Results showed Treatment 2 (G) and Treatment 5 (GSSP) had the same cream color as the control. Statistical analysis showed significant difference in color or appearance between the different treatments. The formulation with the best appearance was Treatment 3 which was described as very desirable by majority (86.6%) of the panelist.

	Treatments 5, 4 and 3 were described to have a very smooth texture while Treatment 2 and the control had moderately smooth texture Analysis of variance on the smoothness revealed a significant difference among treatments.

	Treatments 4 (GSP) was the most stable with 4 minutes and 3 seconds before the peak of the cone melts and drip Treatment 3 (GS) was the least stable from among all the treatments. Treatment 2 (G) was adjudged by majority of the respondents to have a strong characteristics flavor.

	Treatment 5 (GSSP) was significantly tasted to be the most desirable flavor among all formulation.

	The overall acceptability of the respondents in all treatments was described to be "like very much".

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Master of Science-Home Technology)
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes appendices and bibliographical references
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">741</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">741</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-04-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T Sa129 2005</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T320</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-04-02 16:12:28</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-04-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
