<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01547nam a22001937a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250402090106.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250402b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Balawa, Christian Mark D.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Alluminum cans additive in making hollow blocks for agricultural structures/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Christian Mark D. Balawa and Jester B. Lab-Oyan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2024.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xiii, 36 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations, photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The researchers conducted a shredded aluminum cans as additives in making concrete hollow block (CHB) to evaluate the compressive strength of concrete hollow block using Universal Testing Machine (UTM). The study was conducted to compare the compressive strength of concrete hollow block with shredded aluminum cans to those without additives. The data gathered were analyzed using one way analysis of variance
 
Results showed that incorporating of 0.50 kg shredded aluminum cans mixed to concrete hollow block demonstrated the highest maximum strength with a highest average of compressive strength with 0.85 MPa and mean weight of 11.1 kg. The result of Return on Investment was 37.08%. Therefore, it indicated that the return on the investments outweighed the cost</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Bachelor of Science in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering - AB Structure and Environmental Engineering)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and appendices </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lab-Oyan, Jester B., author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">U</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">698</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">698</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GR</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-04-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">U (BSABE) B171a 2024</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">U2383</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-04-02 09:01:48</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-04-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">U</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
