<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02036nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250331101416.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250331b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Petipit, Kevin Joel S.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Growth performance from weaning to growing stages of native pigs fed with different diets/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Kevin Joel S. Petipit</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bauombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2014.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xii, 44 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations (some colored), photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This study used twelve (12) native pigs which were randomly distributed to four treatments such as Treatment 1, commercial feeds, Treatment 2 restaurant left-over Treatment 3 25% gallang. 25% darak, 25% camote leaves and 25% papaya and Treatment 4. 50% corn meal and 50% darak to assess their growth performance.

The results of the study revealed that the average initial weight of Treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 with means of 7.80, 3.600, 4733 and 10 kgs Respectively revealed a highly significant difference (P&lt;0) when subjected to statistical analysis. Moreover, the average daily gain of Treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 with means of 0 437, 0 101, 0.083 and 0.203 kgs respectively showed a non-significant difference after statistical analysis The average final weight of native pigs in Treatments 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 35.166, 6.666, 9 166 and 22.833 kgs respectively A high level of significance (P&lt;0) on the average final weight among the treatment means was shown after statistical analysis On the other hand, the feed conversion ratio of Treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 2.645, 11.765, 18.850 and 5.665 respectively Statistical analysis showed significant differences (P&lt;0) among the FCR treatment means Treatment 3 had the highest cost of feeds per unit body weight which is 224.11 pesos followed by Treatmem4 with 129.71 pesos, Treatment 1 with 118.80 pesos and Treatment 2 with 0 peso.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Doctor of Veterinary Medicine)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes appendices and bibliographical references</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">U</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">598</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">598</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GR</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-03-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">U (DVM) P487g 2014</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">U618</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-03-31 10:14:32</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-03-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">U</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
