<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02040nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250331101106.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250331b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Calomente, Margie M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Determination of optimum pasteurization temperature for citrus (Citrus sinensis), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), guyabano (Annona muricata Linn) juice/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Margie M. Calomente</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2011.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xiv, 56 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This study aimed to determine the optimum temperature in the pasteurization of citrus juice, tomato juice and guyabano juice, to compare the optimum temperature in the pasteurization of the fruit juices, (citrus, tomato and guyabano) and to find out which fruit juice has the best quality in terms of flavor/taste, color/appearance and consistency after pasteurization under different time temperature combinations.
Results showed no significant differences among all treatments in terms of general acceptability, consistency, color/appearance, and flavor/taste. In terms of the degree of acceptability treatments were rated as "like very much" for citrus juice (pasteurized at 66&#xBA;C and 90&#xBA;C) and guyabano juice (pasteurized at 90&#xBA;C) and "like moderately" for other treatments by the laboratory panelists. As to consistency, the treatments were rated as "very desirable" for guyabano juice (pasteurized at 90&#xBA;C) and "moderately desirable" for tomato juice and citrus juice. In terms of the color/appearance, the panelists rated the treatments as "very desirable" for citrus juice (pasteurized at 66&#xBA;C and 90&#xBA;C) tomato juice (pasteurized at 90&#xBA;C, guyabano(pasteurized at 66&#xBA;C &amp; 82&#xBA;C) and "moderately desirable" for other treatments and as to flavor/taste treatments were rated as "moderately desirable" except for citrus juice (pasteurized at 66&#xBA;C) rated as "very desirable" by the panelists.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bibliographical References</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Margie M. Calomente</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">U</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">594</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">594</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-03-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">U (BSHT) C165d 2011</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">U414</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-03-31 10:12:23</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-03-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">U</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
