<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01206nam a22001697a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250331095936.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250331b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Madronio, Marilyn L.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Acceptability of quality protein maize (QPM) based snack recipes (chips, binatog, and muffin)/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Marilyn L. Madronio</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2010.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">x, 29 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This study was conducted to determine the acceptability of quality protein maize (QPM) based snack recipes: chips, binatog and muffin using a sensory panel and to determine the relative preference of the panelists through a ranking test.
Results of the study showed that the QPM muffin was "liked extremely" while the binatog was "liked very much" by the panelists. The difference, however was not found to be statistically significant. The chips on the other hand was "neither liked nor disliked" by the evaluators.
Result of the ranking test showed that the QPM muffin was the most preferred product followed by binatog. The least preferred was the QPM chips.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bibliographical References</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">U</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">585</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">585</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-03-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">U (BSHT) M183a 2010</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">U389</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-03-31 10:00:37</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-03-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">U</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
