<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01946nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250327111349.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250327b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tiangson, Angelica Q.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asexual propagation of broad-winged apitong (dipterocarpus kunstleri king) as affected by various rooting hormones and concentrations with misting system/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Angelica Q. Tiangson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2024.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xiii, 90 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">colored illustrations, photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The study aimed to assess the effects of various rooting hormones (IBA and ANAA) and their different concentrations on broad-winged apitong cuttings. The study was composed of ten treatments arranged in a two-factor Completely Randomized Design (CRD), with Factor A representing the different concentrations and Factor B representing the various rooting hormones. Each treatment was replicated four times, with five samples per replication.
The experiment showed that IBA (16%) was better than ANAA (5%) at promoting root growth. With IBA, a much higher percentage of cuttings were rooted, and the roots were more numerous and longer (mean number 8 and 0.75, respectively). ANAA only produced roots in a couple of cuttings, and the roots were much shorter.

IBA was also better for shoot growth than ANAA. A higher percentage of cuttings produced shoots with IBA (33.75%), and the shoots were longer (0.6). There were some significant differences in its interaction effect with a value of 3.06 and 2.24 in IBA and ANAA respectively. In conclusion, IBA was a much more effective rooting hormone than ANAA for broad-winged apitong cuttings. It increased survival rate, root development, and shoot growth.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Master of Science in Forestry - Forest Resource Management)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes appendices and bibliographical references.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">416</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">416</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GS</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-03-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T T551a 2024</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T1095</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-03-27 11:14:20</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-03-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
