<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02155nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250328164037.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250321b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NVSU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bakakew, Chrysler D.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Prevalence of antimicrobial resistant commercial escherichia coli isolated fecal sample of pigs slaughtered in Solano, Nueva Vizcaya/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Chrysler D. Bakakew</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bayombong:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nueva Vizcaya State University,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xiii, 50 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations, photos ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">28 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The study determined the prevalence of antimicrobial resistant commensal Escherichia coli isolated from fecal samples of pigs slaughtered in Solano, Nueva Vizcaya. A total of 68 fecal samples were collected in this study. Out of 68 pig fecal samples tested, 44 (64.70%) harbored &amp; colt The E. Coli isolates were tested against eight different antimicrobials belonging to seven antimicrobial classes using disk diffusion assay Forty-two (95.4%) of the 44 E colt isolates exhibited resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent. A high over-all percentage resistance at 95.45% and a high percentage of multidrug resistance at 88.1% was observed Highest percentage of resistance was observed in tetracycline (86.36%), amoxicillin (81.82%) and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (77.27%), followed by cefotaxime (47.73%) and chloramphenicol (43.18%) Low percentage resistance was observed in ceftriaxone (3409%) and gentamicin (25%) Resistance was not observed in ciprofloxacin The most common resistance pattern is the chloramphenicol-amoxicillin-trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole-tetracycline. Isolates from the province of Nueva Vizcaya has the highest percentage resistance of 69.05% and also the highest percentage of multidrug resistance at 70.27% In conclusion, this study revealed a high percentage antimicrobial resistance in E. coli from the pigs. Thus, pigs can be considered as important sources of antimicrobial resistant E. coli that can potentially be transmitted to humans.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Doctor of Veterinary Medicine)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">includes appendices and bibliographical references.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">U</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">343</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">343</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NVSUBAY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">GR</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-03-21</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Donation</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">U (DVM) B166p 2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">U1200</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-03-21 14:55:08</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-03-21</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">U</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
